APRA heatmaps underlines importance of including all fees in critical performance tests

Industry Super Australia

APRA has sounded a warning on excessive non-investment fees as its heatmaps blanket many for-profit administration fees in a sea of red.

But, staggeringly, the government continues to ignore the regulator and has deliberately excluded administration fees from its new performance benchmark regime.

The retail sector generates much of its $10 billion annual profit from its lucrative administration fees, and by deliberately carving them out from the performance benchmarks in the Your Future, Your Super legislation the government risks undermining the entire reform package.

The government must shift to the more logical net-return measurement – that tests performance based on all fees and charges – not carving out administration fees.

APRA has strongly expressed how excessive administration fees can impact returns and questioned the justification for asset-based administration fees, favoured in the retail sector. It found some members with a $50,000 balance are paying more than two and a half times higher administration fees than members in other MySuper products.

ISA analysis also shows that the average worker in MySuper products with the highest administration fees will have $158,000 less than those with the lowest fees.

APRA’s heatmaps seem to have already prompted some funds into cutting fees. The success so far underlines the importance of quickly expanding the heatmaps to cover the entire APRA regulated system.

It is disappointing the roll-out beyond MySuper has been further delayed and will not initially cover the whole Choice sector. The Productivity Commission found the Choice sector was the high-fee tail of the system and littered with dud products.

But the Choice sector remains stubbornly immune to transparency measures and performance testing – with no heatmap coverage, product dashboards delayed for more than seven years, and alarmingly the government admitting to having no timeframe to include 80% of the Choice sector in the proposed performance benchmarks.

APRA is right to flag pursuing action against funds who have not lifted their performance from last year’s heatmap release – chronic underperformance should be stamped out no matter where it is found.

/Public Release.