‘Malus’ Species With Diverse Bloom Times Exhibit Variable Rates of Floral Development

Images taken on 17 May 2019, illustrating bloom time differences among Malus genotypes. Each genotype is indicated above the image. The early-blooming genotypes (A-C) were in bloom (A, B) or at petal fall (C). The late-blooming genotypes (D-F) were at tight cluster (D) or approaching pink (E, F). Visible frost damage can be seen on Malus sylvestris (C). Photos by Kevin Maloney.

East Lansing, MI The domesticated apple (Malus ×domestica) is an economically valuable crop and an important source of nutrients and calories throughout temperate regions of the world. Fruit production is directly influenced by bloom time, which is a highly heritable trait greatly affected by the way a genotype perceives its environment. Because of climate change, fruit trees are becoming more susceptible to crop loss. First, early spring freezes may damage developing flower buds and reduce crop yield. These erratic weather events are increasing. Second, climate change has affected chilling accumulation during winter, which disrupts the flower development and synchronicity of bloom.Third, apple flowers are largely self-incompatible, thus requiring growers to select cultivars that bloom synchronously to ensure adequate cross-pollination. Finally, environmental conditions that cause later bloom may result in apple trees being more prone to infection by Erwinia amylovora, the bacterial pathogen that causes fire blight. These production considerations underscore the importance of studying flower development in Malus.

In response to challenges caused by climate change, apple breeding programs must quickly develop more resilient cultivars. One strategy is to breed for various bloom times. Members of the genus Malus, including domesticated apple, wild species, and hybrids, exhibit striking variations in the bloom date. Although bloom time is strongly influenced by chilling requirements, other aspects of floral development in Malus and their contributions to bloom time are less known.

The purpose of this study was to investigate potential connections between predormancy flower development and final bloom time in Malus species. We performed a phenological analysis of flower development in wild and domesticated apple with extreme differences in bloom time over the course of one developmental season. We tracked histological changes in the floral apex of representatives of three early-blooming Malus genotypes (M. ×domestica ‘Anna’ PI 280400, M. orthocarpa PI 589392, M. sylvestris PI 633824) and three late-blooming genotypes (M. angustifolia PI 589763, M. angustifolia PI 613880, M. ×domestica ‘Koningszuur’ PI 188517).

Our study documented their floral meristem progression and organ development and expanded on current staging systems for apple flower development to describe the changes observed. The developmental trajectories of each genotype did not group according to bloom category, and we observed variations in the floral development stage at the time of dormancy onset.

Our research was a preliminary investigation of whether timing of floral initiation and organogenesis in Malus correlate with final bloom time. We documented flower development in early-blooming and late-blooming Malus species over the course of the 2018-19 season. Both genotypic differences in rates of floral bud development and differences in developmental stages before dormancy were identified. Furthermore, the rate of floral development did not strictly correlate with early and late bloom categories. Although our study would be stronger if we sampled a larger number of buds or extended collections over multiple seasons, our results and conclusions are reasonable because floral development was fairly synchronized within the genotypes at each time point. Our results provide valuable comparative phenological data from wild and domesticated apple accessions. This research will inform future studies of flowering in fruit trees and may influence breeding strategies targeting bloom time.

Courtney Hollender is an Assistant Professor, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University. Her lab uses molecular, genetic, and genomic approaches to study aspects of plant developmental biology and physiology that could lead to high-impact advancements in tree fruit agriculture.

The full article is available on the ASHS Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science electronic journal website at DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS05236-22

Established in 1903, the American Society for Horticultural Science is recognized around the world as one of the most respected and influential professional societies for horticultural scientists. ASHS is committed to promoting and encouraging national and international interest in scientific research and education in all branches of horticulture.

Comprised of thousands of members worldwide, ASHS represents a broad cross-section of the horticultural community-scientists, educators, students, landscape and turf managers, government, extension agents and industry professionals. ASHS members focus on practices and problems in horticulture: breeding, propagation, production and management, harvesting, handling and storage, processing, marketing and use of horticultural plants and products. To learn more, visit ashs.org.

/Public Release. View in full here.